This article explains how to properly configure an oscilloscope for ESD pulse testing, covering rise-time thresholds, EMC pulse measurements, parameter limiting, and automated trend capture for compliance testing.
This article explains how to properly configure an oscilloscope for EFT testing, covering sample rates, parameter acceptance, EMC pulse measurements, energy calculations, and efficient burst acquisition techniques.
This article explains how to properly configure an oscilloscope for surge testing, including attenuation setup, measurement threshold adjustments, and calculating pulse area and transferred charge.
Understanding Transmission Line Losses in High-Speed Signals
Transmission line losses—driven by skin effect and dielectric properties—play a critical role in degrading high-speed signal integrity and eye performance.
In surveying the subject of debugging high-speed serial data links, we've noted that there's no one cause for signal-integrity issues between transmitter and receiver, and there's certainly no one solution. But let's begin with the low-hanging fruit: electrical losses in the transmission line. We've previously done a series of posts on transmission lines (beginning here), but it's worth it to have a quick refresher.
Figure 1: Using a 3D field solver to simulate a differential trace
Figure 1 depicts a 20-inch-long, FR-4 microstrip differential trace as simulated using a 3D field solver. There is a spacing of 5 mils between the P and N lines, which themselves are 5 mils wide. With one channel width worth of spacing between them, the two lines are rather tightly coupled to each other.
An advantage of using a 3D field solver is the ability to visualize the field lines on the dielectric and from the conductors themselves. This gives you some insight into the coupling and of the field transmission along the traces. The schematic renderings of Figure 1 show a single-ended impedance of 56.2 Ω for the traces, which is a non-ideal impedance. But it also implies that the differential impedance is about 100 Ω.
Figure 2: The transmission line's single-ended parameters show ringing and reflection effects
A look at the single-ended parameters (Figure 2) reveals ringing due to the dips in the insertion loss and return loss. However, the mixed-mode parameters (Figure 3) are essentially flat, due to that differential impedance of about 100 Ω. The single-ended impedance is a little higher than that because of the coupling effects.
For transmission lines of this nature carrying serial data at very high rates, the primary signal-loss mechanisms are skin effect and dielectric losses. Skin depth is inversely proportional to the signal's frequency, so the higher we go in frequency, the less deeply the current penetrates into the conductor. Rather, it remains on the conductor's surface, which increases resistance and radiation losses at these higher frequencies.
Figure 3: Mixed-mode parameters for the differential trace of Figure 1 are essentially flat
Further, dielectric losses include the effects of loss tangent and dielectric conductivity. All of these contribute to higher losses at higher frequencies, which is quite evident in the plot of losses shown in Figure 3. Beyond 10 GHz or so, the losses are significant and will lead to degraded eye performance at the receiver.
In another post, we'll continue looking at these loss mechanisms and address the elephant in the room: How much loss is too much?
Eric Bogatin presented a webinar Lossy Interconnects and Insertion Loss. This webinar was Part 3 of the High-Speed Interconnect Characterization webinar series. Click the button below to watch this webinar or any other webinar in that series, or download the transcript to preview the webinar content.
Eric is a professor in the EE department at Colorado University, Boulder and a Fellow at Teledyne LeCroy. He has a BS in Physics from MIT and a PhD in Physics from the University of Arizona, Tucson. He enjoys DesignCon and writing for SI Journal.
Transmission line loss directly affects eye diagram quality, with around −12 dB at Nyquist marking the limit before signal integrity rapidly degrades without equalization.
This article explains how PDN design, probing method, and measurement location influence power rail noise—and why board-level measurements can be misleading.
This tutorial explains how quiet I/O probing reveals true on-die rail compression—often far greater than what traditional board-level measurements show.